Clinton's Guide to Sedution
Democrat Party Haters
FAKE NEWS, origins
Free Fake News Dies
Gun Control
Hollywood's Dopey Liberals
Michelle Obama For President 2020
Second Amendment Haters
Share These
Trump Framed
Vote Dem 2016

The Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton conspired with Russia to stop the election of Donald Trump.  When they realized they were failing, they joined with the media, creatures from the depths of the government swamp and other caree politicians to frame Donald Trump for doing what they had been doing.  For almost two years they tried to frame President Trump for illegally colluding with Russia.  They failed.
By April 2018 their plot had been exposed.  Many of those involved with the braze attempt to frame the president were exposed.  Those who had hoped to overthrow the Trump presidency now found themselves being investigate for criminal actions.

The FBI's treasonous plot to overthrow President Trump began before Trump was elected, in August 2016.  Until that time the FBI had been busy making sure Hillary Clinton would win.  Comey's tight little group worked hard to make it seem that Hillary's illegal email server would not bring her down.  In Auguust, however, the FBI came to realize that Trump might win the election.  The FBI decided they needed an insurance plan in case Trump was elected. FBI agent Peter Strzok knew taking out insurance would not change the election outcome; it would enable a President Trump to be overthrown. Strzok suggested the FBI's brazen plot to illegally exonerate Hillary Clinton could become a huge problem if she didn't win the election.  The FBI need a plan to frame an elected Donald Trump with a falsely created crime.

One of the best books exposing the plot to over throw Trump is "The Russia Hoax" by Gregg Jarrett.  Gregg reveals the real story behind Hillary Clinton’s deep state collaborators in government and exposes their nefarious actions during and after the 2016 election.
The Russia Hoax
 reveals how persons within the FBI and Barack Obama’s Justice Department worked improperly to help elect Hillary Clinton and defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.
When this suspected effort failed, those same people appear to have pursued a contrived investigation of President Trump in an attempt to frame President Trump by undoing the election results and remove him as president.
The evidence shows that partisans within the FBI and the Department of Justice, driven by personal animus and a misplaced sense of political righteousness, surreptitiously acted to subvert electoral democracy in our country.
The book will examine:How did Hillary Clinton manage to escape prosecution despite compelling evidence she violated the law?
Did Peter Strzok, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Loretta Lynch, and others obstruct justice by protecting Clinton?
Why was there never a legitimate criminal investigation of Clinton in the Uranium One case?
Are the text messages exchanged between Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page evidence of a concerted effort to undermine the electoral process?
Was there ever any real evidence of "collusion" between Trump and the Russians?
Did Trump obstruct justice in the firing of Comey or was he legally exercising his constitutional authority?
Did the FBI and DOJ improperly use a discredited "dossier" about Trump to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on Trump associates?
Should Muller have disqualified himself under the special counsel law based on glaring conflicts of interest?
Was fired National Security Adviser Michael Flynn unfairly charged with making a false statement?

Another book that reveals the attempts to stop Trump and then frame him for Russian Collusion is:
"Liars, Leakers, and Liberals: The Case Against the Anti-Trump Conspiracy"

James Comey was the FBI director when the plot to frame Trump began.  But, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was reluctant to hand the James Comey's stolen memos to the Congressional Oversight Committe, even though Comey and his friends had already leaked them to the public. And with just a quick read of Comey’s notes, taken contemporaneously in the early months of Trump’s presidency, it became quickly obvious why Trump’s foes within the Justice Department wanted to keep these memos under wraps.
James Comey Memos clearly showed that there was NO COLLUSION and NO OBSTRUCTION.  Comey had leaked classified information.  Still, hundreds of liberal media dopes and liars worked as hard as they coul to get the public to believe that these memos are what Comey and the media have been telling us they are for the past year: Evidence that President Trump obstructed justice.
"The only problem is that they do the complete opposite. Seeing that, we won’t be surprised if CNN is warning viewers by the end of the weekend that viewing these memos is actually against the law and should only be handled by professionals in journalism, if Mueller thought his big charge against Trump was obstruction of justice, he now needs to think twice before he embarrasses himself and the FBI in a major way."

After being fired, James tried to save his reputation by writing a book,  sharing his never-before-told allegations of experiences from some of the "highest-stakes situations of his career in the past two decades of American government."  He arrogantly decided he was the arbiter of what good, ethical leadership looks like, and how it drives sound decisions. His journey of mental fanatasies provides an unprecedented entry into the corridors of power, and a remarkable lesson in what makes a leader in the swamps of Washington, DC.Mr. Comey served as director of the FBI from 2013 to 2017, appointed to the post by President Barack Obama. He previously served as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, and the U.S. deputy attorney general in the administration prosecuting Martha Stewart.  It was, however,his unethical overseeing of the Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation brought him down, before his hoax investigation into the non-existence ties between Trump and Russia.  Comey was involved in some of the most consequential cases and policies of recent history.  Proving that creatures of the deep-state can damage Americans.

On April 20, 2018, Dick Morris made it clear that
"Robert Mueller had run into a wall following up on the Comey investigationand was not likely to get any traction in an attempt to (frame Trump). The newly released Comey memos, (however) make clear that he Comey had no evidence of Trump obstructing justice and all Mueller seemed to be able to do was open new investigations piled upon those that have borne no fruit".
While the Trump framers floundered ("the U.S. attorney may have a far more fruitful time investigating Andrew McCabe and his cronies at the Justice Department. The (proble of Comey's right hand framer. Andy McCabe will reveal the various machinations President Obama and Hillary Clinton to dismiss the charges that she violated national security by her use of a private server.
It will implicate much of the top level of the FBI and the DOJ — including Assistant Attorney General Bruce Ohr, his wife, and the most famous illicit lovers since Romeo and Juliet — Lisa Page and Peter Strzok.
It may lead to a denouement of Mueller’s efforts, as FBI head, to stop the Russian spy conspiracy to buy Uranium from getting out and his efforts to keep the investigation away from Hillary.

OBAMA'S FBI and DOJ conspired to frame Donald Trump.  Trump's Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation colluded to hide critical information from a congressional investigation. In a 5/10/2018 press conference, Speaker Paul Ryan bluntly noted that Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes’s request for details on this secret source documents were “wholly appropriate,” and “completely within the scope” of the committee’s long-running FBI investigation, and “something that probably should have been answered a while ago.” The department knew full well it should have turned this material over to congressional investigators last year, but instead deliberately concealed it. By May 2018 investigators had barely scratched the surface of the FBI’s 2016 behavior, and the country will never get the straight story until President Trump moves to declassify everything possible. House investigators nonetheless sniffed out a name of the FBI spy, and Mr. Nunes in recent weeks issued a letter and a subpoena demanding more details. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s response was to double down—accusing the House of “extortion” and delivering a speech in which he claimed that “declining to open the FBI’s files to review” is a constitutional “duty.” Justice asked the White House to back its stonewall. And it even began spinning that daddy of all superspook arguments—that revealing any detail about this particular asset could result in “loss of human lives.”

The Department of Justice lost its latest battle with Congress when it allowed House Intelligence Committee members to view classified documents about a top-secret intelligence source that was part of the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign. Even without official confirmation of that source’s name, the news so far holds some stunning implications.

The framing of Trump upset real civil libertarians, like Alan Dershowitz.
Mr. Dershowitz writes, "Trump may be many things, but, under current law and the known evidence, the President is not a criminal. ... For anti-Trump zealots, nothing Trump has done—even in foreign policy—is good. Everything he has done is wrong, and since it is wrong, it must necessarily be criminal."  Dershowitz exposes the Russian/Trump collusion investigation as an illusion created by those who hate Trump. "There are great legal minds; there are those who can also communicate well on television; then there is Dershowitz. The professor is uniquely capable of arguing a position, while putting a premium on legal and ethical legitimacy, not its popularity. Bravo, Dershowitz!" – Chris Cuomo, anchor and reporter, CNN "This (book by ALan Dershowitz) shows Alan Dershowitz at his best" — Jeffrey Toobin, bestselling author of The Nine, Too Close to Call, A Vast Conspiracy, and The Run of His Life. "Alan Dershowitz doesn’t twist the constitution to fit an agenda. He tells you what it REALLY means. That’s why he has always been my go-to guy on the law and the Constitution." – Greta Van Susteren, former anchor at CNN, Fox News Channel, and MSNBC "This book will reinforce Alan Dershowitz’s well-earned reputation as a brilliant legal analyst who, although often swimming against the established current, is usually right. Dershowitz substitutes his trenchant legal analysis for the wishful thinking and self-aggrandizing moral superiority that is presented by many in the academy and media, as well as Trump’s political opponents. Dershowitz’s arguments should cause all rational citizens to take a deep breath and recognize, as Dershowitz demonstrates, that Trump may be many things, but, under current law and the known evidence, the President is not a criminal. His analysis seems flawless to me." – Harvey A. Silverglate, Criminal and civil liberties lawyer, author of Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent In our current age of hyper-partisan politics, nearly everyone takes sides. This is especially true with regard to the Trump presidency. It has become difficult to have a reasonable discussion about the most controversial president in our recent history. For Trump zealots, their president has not only committed no crimes, he has done nothing wrong. For anti-Trump zealots, nothing Trump has done—even in foreign policy—is good. Everything he has done is wrong, and since it is wrong, it must necessarily be criminal. This deeply undemocratic fallacy—that political sins must be investigated and prosecuted as criminal—is an exceedingly dangerous trend. Hardening positions on both sides has been manifested by increasing demands to criminalize political differences. Both sides scream “lock ‘em up” instead of making substantive criticisms of opposing views. The real fear, as Alan Dershowitz argues, in this compelling collection, is that we have weakened our national commitment to civil liberties as the Left becomes ever more intolerant and the Right slips into authoritarian rhetoric. The vibrant center is weakening, with traditional liberalism and conservatism becoming further apart, not just in approach, but in their respect for Constitutional norms that have served us well for more than two centuries. While Donald Trump is not the only cause of this profound division, his election drew it to the surface and made it the dominant paradigm of political debate. Unless we as a nation begin to focus again on what unites us rather than on what divides us, America might not survive the next decade.

The investigation into Comey ...
"will show the hoops former Attorney General Loretta Lynch jumped through to hide from the public the fact that Clinton was herself under investigation over the emails.
The U.S. attorney will also have to investigate when McCabe knew about the new batch of Clinton emails, stored on Anthony Weiner’s computer and whether he tried to hide them before the election.
It will elaborate for us how Comey’s pre-election statements were measured as to how they would impact the polls."

President Trump was framed by The FBI, CIA, the DNC and their co-conspirators in the media. On April 26, 2018 the FBI was found tapping the phone of Trump's lawyer, Michael Cohen.
Cohen, according to the FBI, is allegedly under investigation for a payment he made to a porn star, Stormy Daniels, who had alleged she had had sex with Donald Trumpn adult film star who alleged she had an affair with Trump.
It is not clear how long the wiretap has been authorized, but NBC News admitted its anonymous sources said it was in place in the weeks leading up to the raids on Cohen's offices, hotel room, and home in early April, according to one person with direct knowledge.
At least one phone call between a phone line associated with Cohen and the White House was intercepted, proving the FBI still had deep-staters listening in to President Trump's conversations.

The FBI's corrupt attempts to make Hillary President and overthrow President Trump began in July 2016, before Trump's election.  When FBI Director James Comey announced in July that Hillary Clinton would not be indicted for mishandling classified information, America was stunned.
Had the scandal-happy Clintons escaped justice once again? Not so fast, says investigative reporter and bestselling author Ed Klein. There is far more behind Comey's shocking press conference than meets the eye -- and a minefield of email evidence between Hillary and the White House.
In his astonishing new book, Klein uncovers the real story behind Hillary's email scandals and the dirty political games that have kept her one step ahead of the law - for now. Klein reveals what the FBI's team of 150+ investigators really found on Clinton's server. How Comey originally threatened to resign over White House attempts to intervene in the investigation, and his secret plan to go around the Justice Department if needed. How an unprecedented Congressional investigation during an election year is uncovering new shocking evidence of corruption on a level some would call treason. And what Bill and Hillary still have left in their bag of tricks in their desperate quest to get back into the Oval Office.

Robert Mueller’s team became so corrupt by May 2018 that it "leaked to the New York Times the questions Mueller hopes to ask President Trump. The questions are open-ended softball questions meant to entrap for some process crime such as lying.
There were four dozen questions. Many of the questions concern James Comey and his friend, who connived to launch the probe on obstruction charges with Mueller in charge.  Many of these questions concern tweets which would not be part of a serious investigation. How is the President supposed to remember all this? The answer is he’s not. They want to accuse him of lying.
“What was the purpose of your May 12, 2017 tweet?” one question reads. On that day, Trump tweeted that James Comey had “better hope” there are no tapes of his conversations with him before he starts leaking to the press.
“What was your opinion of Mr. Comey during the transition?” another Mueller question asks.
Mueller’s team's scheme was to ask numerous questions about his opinion and what he meant by his tweets or comments in interviews [intent]. Mueller wanted to establish intent, the thing Comey couldn’t find in Hillary’s case. One of Mueller’s team member is an expert on finding ‘intent’ — a thought crime.
Let’s not forget that two of the former corrupt Mueller team members texted a promise “to protect the country” from the “menace”.
Mueller is going for obstruction charges but will settle for any crime.
Fellow attorneys look at Mueller’s team with great skepticism.His lead team member Andrew Weissman is the expert at putting innocent people in prison by withholding exculpatory evidence. A unanimous Supreme Court verdict overturning his Arthur Anderson case supports that statement.

The framing of Donald Trump became more apparent on May 4, 2018 when a "federal judge sharply criticized Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s criminal case in Virginia against President Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and openly questioned whether Mueller exceeded his prosecutorial powers by bringing it.
“I don’t see what relationship this indictment has with anything the special counsel is authorized to investigate,” U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III in the Eastern District of Virginia said.
At a tense hearing at the federal courthouse in Alexandria, Virginia, the judge said Mueller should not have “unfettered power” in his Russia probe and that the charges against Manafort did not arise from the investigation into Moscow’s alleged meddling in the 2016 U.S. election.
“It’s unlikely you’re going to persuade me the special counsel has unfettered power to do whatever he wants,” said Ellis, who was appointed to the bench by Republican President Ronald Reagan" https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-manafort/u-s-judge-questions-special-counsels-powers-in-manafort-case-idUSKBN1I51WE

On May 5, 2018 the Mueller Investigation unwrapped a little more.  Another federal judge rejected special counsel Robert Mueller’s request.  This time Mueller wanted to delay the first court hearing in a criminal case charging three Russian companies and 13 Russian citizens with using social media and other means to foment strife among Americans in advance of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.  This Mueller claim was vital to Mueller and Comey's arguments that Russia had tried to hack U.S. elections.
In a brief order U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich offered no explanation for her decision to put off the scheduled arraignment for Concord Management and Consulting, one of the three firms charged in the case.

The never-ending probe into Trump's alleged collusion had nothing, after almost two years of investigation by Comey and his friend Mueller.  When it came time for the trial of the alleged Russians, claimed to be Russianbots for Trump, Mueller did not have enough evidence to go to trial.
The endless investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election, had - as intended - formed the cloudy backdrop of Donald Trump’s presidency – a rolling fog of controversy, much of it infected with untruthful leaks, which was a near-constant distraction for the commander in chief.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller and James Comey worked for years, relentlessly searchng for proof Donald Trump colluded with Russians. In May, 2018 one episode about Mueller’s and his former law enforcement comrades uncovered a conflict of interest in his overseeing the Russia election probe."In 2009, when Mueller ran the FBI, the bureau asked Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to spend millions of his own dollars funding an FBI-supervised operation to rescue a retired FBI agent, Robert Levinson, captured in Iran while working for the CIA in 2007.
That’s the same Deripaska who has surfaced in Mueller’s current investigation and who was recently sanctioned by the Trump administration.

After 18 months of investigations by the FBI and Mueller's special, democrat party, prosecutors, there was still no evidence of Trump colluding with Russia to win the 2016 election. Eighteen months have yielded a flurry of indictments, unrelated to any Trump/Russia collusion, some minimal guilty pleas forced upon a few and a multitude of half-truth leaks from the DOJ, CIA, FBI and other deep-state swamp creatures.  After 18 months there has been no evidence of colluding, so the democrat special investigators have decided to try and prove Trump obstructed justice.

After 18 months of FBI and Mueller investigating Trump's collusion with Russia, the entire investigation was unraveling.  The criminal misdeeds of the FBI, DOJ and others became more obvious.
A report showed the FBI under former President Obama spied on the Trump campaign during the 2016 presidential race.  This is a much greater scandal truly bigger than Watergate.
The Obama FBI 'SPIED ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN WITH AN EMBEDDED INFORMANT,'" the president tweeted in reference to a National Review report published.  Andrew McCarthy said, 'There’s probably no doubt that they had at least one confidential informant in the campaign.' If so, this is bigger than Watergate!”