FACEBOOK CENSORS CONTINUE TO BE CONNFUSED. 11/7/2018 Dear Facebook Watchers: This
is a real news story about real citizens rejecting the notion that our
planet is in imminent peril from carbon dioxide produced in the U.S..
What TOS could this possible violate? Are you working to hide what
citizens feel about "climate change"? HERE'S WHAT FACEBOOK CENSORED ************************************* CITIZENS REALIZE "GLOBAL WARMING" IS A HOAX.While global warming may exist, the idea that it is an imminent global threat caused by evil Americans, is obviously false. Carbon dioxide created by U.S. citizens does NOT cause any imminent threat to the planet. "Efforts to nudge the nation away from burning fossil fuels and toward harnessing renewable source of energy were rejected by voters Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2018 across a swath of resource-rich states in western states.The failure of environmental ballot measures in Arizona, Colorado - and the likely defeat of a proposal to impose fees on carbon emissions in Washington state - underscore the difficulty of tackling a global problem like climate change at the state and local level, where huge sums of money poured in on both sides.
FACEBOOK'S FAKE METRICS UPSET MEDIA Facebook finally, very quietly, admitted that it misreported key metrics. 'In April, 2016 Mark Zuckerbergsaid the following: “We’re entering this new golden age of video . . . I wouldn’t be surprised if you fast-forward five years and most of the content that people see on Facebook and are sharing on a day-to-day basis is video.” A little over a month later, according to a lawsuit, the company would follow up on complaints that it knew about about issues with its video metrics since 2015. Months after that, Facebook finally, very quietly, admitted that it misreported key metrics. For full details visit SOCIAL MEDIA DANGERS: http://boomerspeaks.com/61182/index.html Source: https://www.fastcompany.com/90252751/why-media-people-are-furious-over-facebooks-bad-video-metrics.
FACEBOOK WATCHERS HAVE A TECHNIQUE TO DISCOURAGE CONSERVATIVE POSTS. One harassed conservative Facebook member wrote this. "10/04/2018 To: FACEBOOK WATCHERS Today I made 3 posts to groups. One post was to my own group. All posts were to groups to which I belong. Facebook has chosen to harass me by making me click through pictures with each post I make. Please tell me why, when I post to groups, you always make me prove I am not a "robot". For full details visit SOCIAL MEDIA DANGERS: http://boomerspeaks.com/61182/index.html
10/03/2018 - FACEBOOK WATCHERS MAKE MORE MISTAKES. To Facebook Watchers: A post to a debate page, with an honest question to debate cannot be "spam". Why did you Watcher say "this looks like spam" for a post that said: "DO YOU BELIEVE WHAT YOU SEE IN THIS FREE ONE HOUR MOVIE: Official Trump @War? Is this Movie video proof of democrat hate, violence and lies?" It seems the Facebook Watchers are upset when anyone circulates this 1 hour movie. For full details visit SOCIAL MEDIA DANGERS: http://boomerspeaks.com/61182/index.html .
9/30/2018 - FACEBOOK'S NAMELESS AND FACELESS WATCHERS FLIP OUT BANNING CONSERVATIVE POSTS. Here's some correspondence shared with the Facebook Watchers. 9/30/2018 note to Facebook's nameless and faceless monitors:"The post you removed is obviously not spam. It was posted on the "American Way" debate page. The question was simple, "Are there any jobs as good as a job as a U.S. politician?Are the pay and benefits so good politicians are enticed to keep their jobs rather than working for citizens?"Attached was an article about House politicians starting a 39 day vacation.How could Facebook watchers consider this "spam"? You claim it "looks like" "spam" to you. Why?" 9/30/2018 note to Facebook's nameless and faceless monitors: "The post you removed is obviously not spam. It was posted on the "CONFIRM JUDGE KAVANAUGH PAGE" and an article showing a linkage between Kavanaugh's accuser and Peter Strozk. How could Facebook watchers consider this "spam"? You claim it "looks like" "spam" to you. Why?" 9/30/2018 note to Facebook's nameless and faceless monitors: "The post you removed is obviously not spam. It was posted on the "CONFIRM JUDGE KAVANAUGH PAGE" and stated that congress was a ship of fools. How could Facebook watchers consider this "spam"? You claim it "looks like" "spam" to you. Why?" 9/30/2018 note to Facebook's nameless and faceless monitors: "The post you removed is obviously not spam. It was posted on a political debate page and asked "IS CONGRESS A SHIP OF FOOLS?" How could Facebook watchers consider this "spam"? You claim it "looks like" "spam" to you. Why?" Details at http://boomerspeaks.com/61182/index.html
On 9/29/2018 a Facebook censor thought this was "spam" or violated "community standards". How can a factual statement posted in my own group be spam or violate community standards? Details at http://boomerspeaks.com/61182/index.html https://www.facebook.com/LJnewservice/photos/p.1517539928392502/1517539928392502/?type=3
9/29/2018 CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN THE ACTIONS OF FACEBOOK'S CENSORS. How can a post that simply questions the ACLU being non-partisan and mentioning that NBC produce Fake News be spam or not abide by Facebook rules? Details at http://boomerspeaks.com/61182/index.html
FACEBOOK KEEPS ON CENSORING. Here's an example of them censoring a post on a debate page. "Why are all men rapists? What motivates sexual abusers like Judge Brett Kavanaugh (note 1)? Why are so few caught? Drawing on the stories of abusers, Anna C. Salter
shows that sexual predators use sophisticated deception techniques and
rely on misconceptions surrounding them to evade discovery. Arguing that
even the most knowledgeable among us can be fooled, Salter dispels the
myths about sexual predators and gives us the tools to protect our
families and ourselves. Note 1: Judge Brett Kavanaugh was never
found guilty, by a court. of rape. Progressive and liberal people,
however, realize that when a man is accused of rape the woman must be
believed. This means the man must PROVE his innocence." Details at:
http://boomerspeaks.com/61182/index.html FACEBOOK BANNED THIS POST FROM A DEBATE PAGE.This note was sent as an appeal to Facebook. "9/29/2018This is a post to a debate page to debate a question that has - and still - exists. Please explain how Facebook could consider this to be "spam". https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=260302888159730&set=p.260302888159730&type=3
Facebook bans conservative thought, especially from their "protected" classes, like gays and blacks.
FACEBOOK WILL BE WATCHING YOU MORE CLOSELY THAN EVER. "Facebook Will Start Fact-Checking Your Posts, Photos and Videos
"The social-media company will use technology (developed by totally unbiased software creators) and (totally unbiased) human reviewers to help flag false content." The unbiased software and unbiased reviewers are all knowing and will eliminate "false content" quickly.
"Facebook Inc. will begin fact-checking photographs and videos posted on the social media platform, seeking to close a gap that allowed Russian propagandists (and Trump Supporters) to promote" politically incorrect " news during the last U.S. presidential election. The company said Thursday, 9/13/2018, it will use technology and human reviewers to try to staunch what it called in a statement “misinformation in these new visual formats.” Previously, the company’s efforts had been focused on rooting out false articles and links" Now, as the 2018 elections near, Facebook's unbiased reviewers and unbiased software will be able to delete and ban all politically incorrect material supporting Trump or Republican politicians. CLICK HERE FOR FULL DETAILS: http://boomerspeaks.com/61182/index.html . Source: https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-to-start-fact-checking-photos-videos-1536867288 .
Senior Google Scientist Resigns Over “Forfeiture of Our Values” in China. Google's desires to mold people's minds became too much for one Google scientist. "Jack Poulson worked for Google’s research and machine intelligence department, where he was focused on improving the accuracy of the company’s search systems.
In early August, Poulson raised concerns with his managers at Google after The Intercept revealed that the internet giant was secretly developing a Chinese search app for Android devices. The search system, code-named Dragonfly, was designed to remove content that China’s authoritarian government views as sensitive, such as information about political dissidents, free speech, democracy, human rights, and peaceful protest.
After entering into discussions with his bosses, Poulson decided in mid-August that he could no longer work for Google. He tendered his resignation and his last day at the company was August 31, 2018. . ***Click here for full details***.
Sources: https://theintercept.com/2018/09/13/google-china-search-engine-employee-resigns/ . : Senior Google Scientist Resigns Over “Forfeiture of Our Values” in China
IS IT TIME TO BREAK UP SOCIAL MEDIA CORPORATIONS THAT REPLACE FREE SPEECH WITH THOUGHT CONTROL? The monopoly-busting case against Google, Amazon, Facebook
and other tech companies with our nation's antitrust law, is something worth considering. "Groups like Open Markets have made a strong case that big companies (especially big tech companies) are distorting the market to drive out competitors. We need a new standard for monopolies, they argue, one that focuses less on consumer harm and more on the skewed incentives produced by a company the size of Facebook or Google.
Someday soon, those ideas will be put to the test, probably against one of a handful of companies. For anti-monopolists, it’s a chance to reshape tech into something more democratic and less destructive. It’s just a question of which company makes the best target." Click here for details: http://boomerspeaks.com/61182 Source: https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/5/17805162/monopoly-antitrust-regulation-google-amazon-uber-facebook .
FACEBOOK wants to remove the page, "WHITE LIVE MATTER" Full details at http://boomerspeaks.com/61182.html. An unnamed Facebook official claimed an unmentioned post on "WHITE LIVE MATTER" (https://www.facebook.com/WLMalso/) ignored an unidentified Facebook Term of Service. It's hard to believe that exposing bigotry against whites is now politically incorrect. Posts on "WHITE LIVE MATTER" only highlighted ant-white discrimination.
SOCIAL MEDIA GIANTS MAY BE IN TROUBLE. Google, Facebook, Amazon may be in an an antitrust situation for their attack on free speech for conservatives.
CONSERVATIVES MUST BE CAREFUL ON DANGEROUS SOCIAL MEDIA SITES RUN BY THOSE WHO HATE PRESIDENT TRUMP. Be Careful When Using These Social Media Platforms. You Might be the Next To Be Banned?You’ve probably heard about the banning of Alex Jones’s social media pages by Facebook, Apple, Spotify, and YouTube, and there are many fascist democrats applauding this action to silence opposing views. After all, Jones is sensationalist, controversial, and given to conspiracy theories, and, given that he’s been putting out material like this for years, that’s unlikely to change. The disturbing thing to consider is that these tech giants censor Jones, who most people would generally consider to be on the far right politically, but these same giants aren’t censoring material from other people which is downright offensive such as new New York Times editorial board member Sarah Jeong who called “white people” “dogs” and “goblins” and called for violence against them. Oh, and the New York Times is known for having a political viewpoint which does not lean to the right. In fact, you know the situation with Facebook, Apply, Spotify, and YouTube is crazy and wrong when people who are completely opposed to Alex Jones’s political positions oppose the actions of these tech giants. ***Click here for the full story*** http://boomerspeaks.com/61182.html Source: http://survivalinstitute.com/be-careful-when-using-these-social-media-platforms-are-you-next-to-be-banned/
SECRET FACEBOOK NAZIS DECIDE IF YOU ARE TRUSTWORTHY. (SN) 8/21/2018 As a Facebook user you are given a double-secret "score on a scale from zero to one that determines if
they have a good or bad reputation – but it's completely hidden" from you. Facebook's Tessa Lyons, who heads up Facebook's secretive fight against fake news, said: "One of the signals we use is how people interact with articles." This means an organized group of democrats can collide to question conservative's posts. Tessa admitted, "For example, if someone previously gave us feedback that an article
was false and the article was confirmed false by a (liberally biased Facebook) fact-checker, then we
might weight that person’s future false news feedback more than someone
who indiscriminately provides false news feedback on lots of articles,
including ones that end up being rated as true." ***Click here or more information*** SOURCE: https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/7067261/facebook-trust-rating-score-check/
(SM) 8/2018 SOCIAL MEDIA'S CENSORSHIP OF CONSERVATIVES WAS A GEORGE SOROS-FUNDED PLAN, "The recent wave of censorship of conservative voices on the internet by tech giants Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Apple mirrors a plan concocted by a coalition of George Soros-funded, progressive groups to take back power in Washington from President Trump’s administration.
A confidential, 49-page memo for defeating Trump by working with the major social-media platforms to eliminate “right wing propaganda and fake news” was presented in January 2017 by Media Matters founder David Brock at a retreat in Florida with about 100 donors, the Washington Free Beacon reported at the time. The Gateway Pundit blog noted the memo’s relationship with recent moves by Silicon Valley tech giants to “shadow ban” conservative political candidates and pundits and remove content.The Free Beacon obtained a copy of the memo, “Democracy Matters: Strategic Plan for Action,” by attending the retreat.The memo spells out a four-year agenda that deployed Media Matters along with American Bridge, Shareblue and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) to attack Trump and Republicans. The strategies are impeachment, expanding Media Matters’ mission to combat “government misinformation,” ensuring Democratic control of the Senate in the 2018 midterm elections, filing lawsuits against the Trump administration, monetizing political advocacy, using a “digital attacker” to delegitimize Trump’s presidency and damage Republicans, and partnering with Facebook to combat “fake news.”The Free Beacon in its January 2017 story said Brock sought to raise $40 million in 2017 for his organizations. The document claims Media Matters and far-left groups have “access to raw data from Facebook, Twitter, and other social media sites” so they can “systemically monitor and analyze this unfiltered data. SOURCE: https://www.wnd.com/2018/08/mask-off-social-media-censor-king-revealed/ Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2018/08/mask-off-social-media-censor-king-revealed/#exCwwoBdeV012dVY.99
LJN News about Social Media - 8/7/2018 - Democrat Party plans for government takeover of the Internet. Facebook, Apple and YouTube censor conservatives. Instagram banned Conservative Tommy Robinson. Facebook banned Republican congressional candidate Elizabeth Heng’s campaign video ad. http://boomerspeaks.com/61182.html
AMAZON JOINS BOYCOTT OF CONSERVATIVES. Amazon has refused to stamp conservative products for approval. A Politicostory from August 7, 2018 noted that many Alex Jones products had the “Amazon’s Choice” logo on it, which is an internal stamp of approval for certain items on the platform. Now, it seems Amazon has taken the “Choice” designation away from Jones’s products. Over the last few days we’ve seen the big tech companies make sweeping decisions about Alex Jones and Infowars. Apple took them off its podcast app; Facebook banned Jones and his associated pages; YouTube also banned the conspiracy theorist. The ecommerce giant Amazon also refused to accept LJN News as an affiliate. .https://www.fastcompany.com/90214900/amazon-seems-to-have-quietly-stopped-recommending-alex-jones-products .
Instagram banned Conservative Tommy Robinson’s account, then was forced to reactivate it and admit it made an error. Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon, followed conservative Alex Jones from Infowars and controversial Milo Yiannopoulos in the list of conservative populists to be banned from social media.
Robinson, 35, was already banned from Twitter in March this year, supposedly for breaching its secretive ‘hateful conduct’ policy. However his Facebook and YouTube pages remain active.. https://metro.co.uk/2018/08/07/instagram-bans-tommy-robinson-as-social-media-companies-purge-far-right-7807413/ . .
FACEBOOK ADMITS ITS SOCIAL MEDIA IS BIASED AGAINST CONSERVATIVE VIEWS. Social Media is clearly slanted against conservatives.
The top companies are almost exclusively located in Silicon Valley, and the leftist politics of the region have seeped into the corporate culture.
Now social network behemoth Facebook is launching a new venture that should irritate conservatives even more.
In the wake of Donald Trump’s election, Facebook has encountered heavy scrutiny from the left.
Liberals who refuse to accept the legitimacy of President Trump have clung to every reason possible for Hillary Clinton’s glorious defeat.
Chief among the excuses is Russian collusion based on the DNC servers being hacked, a claim that hasn’t been sufficiently proven.
Former FBI Director James Comey and former Homeland Security chief Jeh Johnson both testified before Congress that neither bureau was granted access to the DNC servers, which is astonishing considering the fervor and certainty of the “hacked” narrative.
Facebook was roped into the controversy because the Russians apparently attempted to sow seeds of discontent on the social media giant. The Russians spent a pittance on insignificant pages that supported both Black Lives Matter and the alt-right, but this was proof for the left that Facebook needed to crack down.
In response, Facebook altered their news algorithm and popular conservative pages stopped showing up in people’s feeds. http://offthewire.com/facebook-just-made-a-move-that-proves-its-censoring-conservatives/
HOW DID SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGE TO TAKE CONTROL OF OUR COMMUNICATIONS? Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google are the four most influential companies on the planet. Just about everyone thinks they know how they got there. Just about everyone is wrong. HOW DID THEY MANAGE TO TAKE CONTROL OF OUR COMMUNICATIONS? For all that’s been written about the Four over the last two decades, no one has captured their power and staggering success as insightfully as Scott Galloway. Instead of buying the myths these companies broadcast, Galloway asks fundamental questions. How did the Four infiltrate our lives so completely that they’re almost impossible to avoid (or boycott)? Why does the stock market forgive them for sins that would destroy other firms? And as they race to become the world’s first trillion-dollar company, can anyone challenge them? In the same irreverent style that has made him one of the world’s most celebrated business professors, Galloway deconstructs the strategies of the Four that lurk beneath their shiny veneers. He shows how they manipulate the fundamental emotional needs that have driven us since our ancestors lived in caves, at a speed and scope others can’t match. And he reveals how you can apply the lessons of their ascent to your own business or career. Whether you want to compete with them, do business with them, or simply live in the world they dominate, you need to understand the Four. >http://linksynergy.walmart.com/deeplink?id=w2VGpneWfTE&mid=2149&murl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.walmart.com%2Fip%2FThe-Four-The-Hidden-DNA-of-Amazon-Apple-Facebook-and-Google%2F55746868 <
APPLE WILL JOIN GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK TO DECIDE WHAT NEWS YOU CAN SEE. Apple’s Vice President of Product Marketing Susan Prescott made an announcement that Apple would be selecting the top news stories that appear in Apple News during the company’s Worldwide Developers Conference on Monday, June 4, 2018. Like Facebook and Google, Apple's executives know the news you should see. https://ntknetwork.com/apple-were-going-to-pick-the-news-stories-you-read/
FACEBOOK IS A THREAT TO OUR PRIVACY. "As Facebook sought to become the world’s dominant social media service, it struck agreements allowing phone and other device makers access to vast amounts of its users’ personal information. Facebook ... reached data-sharing partnerships with at least 60 device makers — including Apple, Amazon, BlackBerry, Microsoft and Samsung — over the last decade, starting before Facebook apps were widely available on smartphones, company officials (admitted). The deals allowed Facebook to expand its reach and let device makers offer customers popular features of the social network, such as messaging, “like” buttons and address books. But the partnerships, whose scope has not previously been reported, raise concerns about the company’s privacy protections and compliance with a 2011 consent decree with the Federal Trade Commission. Facebook allowed the device companies access to the data of users’ friends without their explicit consent, even after declaring that it would no longer share such information with outsiders. Some device makers could retrieve personal information even from users’ friends who believed they had barred any sharing... Most of the partnerships remain in effect, though Facebook began winding them down in April. The company came under intensifying scrutiny by lawmakers and regulators after news reports in March that a political consulting firm, Cambridge Analytica, misused the private information of tens of millions of Facebook users. In the furor that followed, Facebook’s leaders said that the kind of access exploited by Cambridge in 2014 was cut off by the next year, when Facebook prohibited developers from collecting information from users’ friends. But the company officials did not disclose that Facebook had exempted the makers of cellphones, tablets and other hardware from such restrictions. “You might think that Facebook or the device manufacturer is trustworthy,” said Serge Egelman, a privacy researcher at the University of California, Berkeley, who studies the security of mobile apps. “But the problem is that as more and more data is collected on the device — and if it can be accessed by apps on the device — it creates serious privacy and security risks.” https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/06/03/technology/facebook-device-partners-users-friends-data.html
FACEBOOK SELLS YOUR INFORMATION TO CHINESE COMPANIES THAT ARE A SECURITY THREAT. Have you seen those nice Facebook ads telling you how they are protecting you? Facebook may have forgotten it "has data-sharing partnerships with at least four Chinese electronics companies, including a manufacturing giant that has a close relationship with China's government.
The agreements, which date to at least 2010, gave private access to some user data to Huawei, a telecommunications equipment company that has been flagged by American intelligence officials as a national security threat, as well as to Lenovo, Oppo and TCL. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/05/facebook-gave-data-access-to-chinese-firm-flagged-by-us-intelligence.html
GOOGLE IS A THREAT TO OUR NATION. On June 11, 2019 it was revealed that "Google has been getting some bad publicity recently over its use of data, its near monopoly position with android phones and search. And now it won't help defend America. The founders, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, are both worth more than $50 billion. They should appear before Congress to explain why they won't help defend the country which has showered them with such massive wealth." https://www.facebook.com/FoxBusinessVoices/videos/2001080496875954/UzpfSTE0MzQwNDY1NDk6MTAyMTI4MjUwMDQxNjY2MTY/
We are currently creating content for this section. In order to be able to keep up with our high standards of service, we need a little more time. Please stop by again. Thank you for your interest!
.***Click here for full details***.
Source: x .